| |


This web page represents a distillation of the major
ideas and information associated with the Biological Science (BIOL 1003)
course. References to page numbers, Figures, and Tables, are
associate with optional reading assignments Asking about Life (3rd edition;
2005) by Tobin
and Dusheck.. If you note any errors in the following document,
I'd appreciate it if you would bring this to my attention. Email address: mhuss@astate.edu.
How to be successful in this course! Things
you can do to help you comprehend and understand the content of this course.
- Attend class lectures!!!! Regular attendance is a must!
- Ask questions in class and/or by email, chances are you're not alone.
- I am accessible - contact or stop by to speak with me. If you are
have difficulties with the course material, you have a right to contact me
during my office hours. If the posted office hours are not convenient
to discuss course matters with me, then arrange an appointment with me that
better fits your school/work schedule.
- Read the reading assignments in the textbook!
- As you read the sections from the textbook, note words that are in bold
print. Look up meanings in book glossary or a dictionary.
- As you read the sections from the textbook, review chapter overviews and
summaries.
- Study as we cover the material. Waiting until the last minute to
review material for exams is conducive to stress and less so to
learning.
Biology - the scientific study of life.
BIOLOGY IS A SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE THAT STUDIES LIFE
Think of a name of a living organism (e.g., lion, cactus, whale, bear).
Where do they live (savanna, desert, ocean, forest)? Animals, bacteria,
plants and fungi have adapted to a wide variety of habitats, possess different
ways of making a living (acquiring the stuff they need to stay alive) and
methods of reproducing and dispersing themselves.
- Currently there are over 1,413,000 species of plants, animals, bacteria,
protozoa, fungi, etc. that have been described.
-
BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY is divided into 6 Kingdoms (Refer
to Figure 1-5, page 10) - these
include: Eubacteria, Archaea, Protista, Fungi, Plantae, Animalia
What characteristics do all these organisms share? All living organisms
share certain characteristics or activities that separate them from non-living
matter. What are some of these?
- Structure/organization, which arise from the basic properties of matter
and energy.
- Metabolism - "energy transfers".
- Homeostasis - Maintain a livable internal environment.
- Reproduction
- Response to stimuli (e.g., temperature, injury, light, gravity, etc.).
- Movement.
- Mutations or changes in form are possible.
- Adaptation to the environment.
- Interdependence with other organisms.
- Blueprint of life is coded by nucleic acid.
- Growth and development.
Look over the above list. This is a
list of the topics that we'll cover this semester!
WHAT IS SCIENCE?
Science is an organized system of knowledgea obtained by a
special methodb, the "scientific method", of research and
aimed at explaining the causes and behavior of the natural universec.
aThere are different kinds of knowledgea:
e.g., knowledge of a language, literature, automotive mechanics, cooking, law,
philosophy, the meaning of words.
bSCIENTIFIC METHOD
Science is not about proof or absolute
truth. Science is more about reducing uncertainty then stating things as
hard cold fact.
1. Problem or question based on
observation.
2. Hypothesis - "education
guess" to answer or explain the question.
3. Experimentation (to determine if
the hypothesis is valid or not).
A. Prediction
B. The test
4. Conclusion
cNatural universe - Science
can say how a guitar string creates sound when plucked, but it can say little
about the aesthetic value of music. Science can say nothing outside it's
realm of expertise, in regard to ethics, morality, and the supernatural.
SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY
EXAMPLE #1: Falling bodies
Observation: Objects fall under the influence of gravity.
1. Question: Objects fall toward the ground when dropped. What happens if two
objects of different mass are dropped simultaneously from the same height? Will
they fall at the same speed or at different speeds?
2. Hypothesis: The two balls will hit the floor at the same time.
3. Alternate hypotheses:
- The heavier ball will hit the floor before the lighter ball.
- The lighter ball will hit the floor before the heavier ball.
4. The Experiment: Two tennis balls of the same
size, one filled with metal BBs, the other is not. The only variable in
the experiment is difference in mass. Otherwise both balls are the same. The
less massive ball serves as our control.
TRY THIS DEMONSTRATION: Drop the two balls
simultaneously from the same height. Both balls hit the floor at the same
time.
5. Conclusion: The speed of a falling object is independent of mass.
EXAMPLE #2: Biological Problems
OBSERVATION: Zebras live on the African savanna.
Zebras have stripes.

QUESTION: Why are zebras striped?
First thing you do is look at the literature to see if this question has been
asked by others. Look at their hypotheses and experimental data. Are
you satisfied that their conclusions are reasonable. If not, proceed to
next step.
Potential or Alternative Hypotheses:
1. Stripes in zebras is a warning display. Warning Displays in
Animals (i.e., skunks, bees, hornets, poisonous arrow frogs, rattlesnakes,
monarch butterflies). These animals go out of their way to make themselves
look conspicuous, to ward off potential predators.
2. Zebras with stripes are more difficult for predators to capture.
The silhouette of their bodies are broken up when a group of animals are
arranged in a herd. Harder to distinguish one animal from another and
therefore pick out a potential prey item to take down in the confusion created
for the predator. 3. Zebras have stripes for no particular reason. No adaptive
value.
4. Stripes on a zebra are a sexual display for attracting mates.
5. Stripes assist the zebra in thermoregulation when exposed to the
heat of living life on the savanna.
6. Others hypotheses?
EXPERIMENTATION: Prediction/test.
If it is a warning display, then you would predict that other animals will
avoid zebras. So you go to Africa to a savanna and you watch how predators
react to zebras. If its a warning display, maybe they stay clear of
zebras. Unfortunately you find that lions love to eat any zebra they come
across. They aren't avoiding them at all!
Another strategy would be to determine if their is something about zebras
that another animal would want to avoid. If it is a warning display, what
is it warning against? You would predict that zebras must possess some
characteristic that makes it worth avoiding them. At the zoo, you notice
that the zebras don't spray foul smelling chemicals like skunks, they don't
sting (although zebras probably do kick and bite when cornered). So you
think, maybe they taste bad or are poisonous to animals that eat them. So
you test this by seeing how some animal reacts after eating some zebra meat vs.
a control (horse meat).
What do you do after exhaustive study, if you find no evidence that stripes
on a zebra serve as a warning display? You abandon the hypothesis that
stripes on a zebra serve as a warning display. Note that experiments did
not demonstrate that alternative hypotheses are not true. Why?
Because the experiments were not designed to do this.
Further experimentation might show that one or more of the alternate
hypotheses is not consistent with experimental observation. You don't
prove that one hypothesis is correct, rather you become more certain that with
repeated testing your power of prediction will increase.
Prevailing hypotheses as to why zebras are striped
include:
- A strategy for avoiding predators. Up close
predators see them just fine. However at a distance, the striped
pattern breaks up their appearance against the background, especially if
these are running in different directions, making them harder to follow and
chase down!
- A way to avoid being bitten by the tsetse fly (a fly
that carries sleeping sickness - caused by a protozoan). The
striped pattern plays havoc on this insect's ability to home in on its next
victim.
- A strategy of removing excess heat (common on the
open savannas of Africa) by reflecting a portion of it away from the body,
especially from the white stripes.
- A means for recognizing different individuals within
a herd, as no two zebras have striped patterns exactly like another.
When
scientists engage in scientific research, most of them don't sit down and think,
"Gee, I think I'll make an observation. What kinds of questions come
to mind? Perhaps I should write down some potential hypotheses.
1,2,3, 4 etc. Ah, now let's see, I will do an experiment to test one of my
hypotheses. I will engage in inductive and deductive
reasoning". Scientists don't act like the stereotypic characters on
television shows (e.g., Mr. Spock from Star Trek or the Professor from
Gilligan's Island). Creativity, personal biases, hard work, hit and miss
speculation, experimentation, availability of funds and resources, existence of
appropriate technology, and dumb luck all come into play. The reason for
outlining the "scientific method" is to try to dissect the essential
elements of the process. Also scientists aren't like Bill Nye - the
science guy, Mr. Wizard, or Beakman from Beakman's World. These are science
educators, but when they do experiments they already know what the outcome of
the experiment will be. Not so with scientists.
FACT: a confirmed or, at least, agreed-upon empirical
observation (or conclusion if referring to an "inferred" fact).
For example, a fossil is generally accepted by most biologists as evidence for
life in the distant past, even if the apparent life form no longer exist in
today's world (e.g., dinosaurs, ammonites - an extinct mollusk, etc.).
That fossils are the remnants or the products of something once alive is an
inferred fact, even though the living organism is no longer present.
HYPOTHESIS: a proposed explanation of certain "facts"
that must be empirically testable in some conceivable fashion.
THEORY: an integrated, comprehensive explanation of many
"facts" and an explanation capable of generation additional hypotheses
and testable predictions about the way the natural world looks and works.
A generally accepted scientific theory is a well-tested hypothesis supported by
a great deal of evidence. The scientific definition of theory is different
then what is used by the lay person - like a guess. "Oh well,
it's only a theory". In fact a theory is well tested, and if
consistent with the data, possesses a high degree of certainty (although not
equivalent to proof).
A HIERARCHY EXISTS COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT LEVELS
OF ORGANIZATION WHICH ALLOWS LIFE AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS TO PERSIST ON EARTH
ATOMS ===> MOLECULES ===> ORGANIC
MACROMOLECULES===>CELLULAR COMPONENTS ===> CELLS ===> TISSUES ===>
ORGANS ===> ORGAN SYSTEM ===> ORGANISM ===> POPULATION (SAME SPECIES)
===> COMMUNITY (DIFFERENT SPECIES) ===> ECOSYSTEM (COMMUNITIES AND THEIR
ENVIRONMENT) ===> BIOSPHERE (ALL LIFE ON EARTH)
Evolution: A Unifying Theme in Biology
Does life evolve (change over time)? Do species give rise over time to
new species?
What is a species?
- Concept of species is pre-dates the birth of the Greek philosopher,
Aristotle.
- Basic unit of classifying different organisms, whether you use scientific
or common names. The Latin word specere, from which our word
"species" is derived, means "to look at." The word
originally referred to the outward appearance of an organism.
- Examples of different species that the average person recognizes include
cardinals, bluebirds, snow geese, cats, dogs, petunias, roses, and so on.
- Greek species concept. Aristotle
(384-322 B.C.) and Theophrastus (late fourth and early third centuries B.C.)
conceived of species as unstable and highly changeable. Aristotle
believed in spontaneous generation of species, and regarded all kinds of
crosses between species as feasible, likely, and a means for the creative
construction of new species.
- Rampant hybridization could produce a new species. A camel could
hybridize with a panther to produce a giraffe. An Arabian camel crossed
with a wild boar produced the two-humped Bactrian camel. Oppian
argued that a camel crossed with a sparrow produced an ostrich.
- Greek view persisted through the Middle Ages, and only in the 18th century
did it begin change. In the 1750's, the naturalist Buffon contributed to the
idea that species were discrete entities. Theologians and naturalists of the
time argued for the fixity of species, the view that each species remained
as created by God, according to the accounts given in the Book of Genesis in
the Judeo-Christian Bible.
- By the middle of the 18th century, the discreteness and stability of
species were generally recognized, setting the scene for Linnaeus and other
taxonomists to collect representative members of each species, preserve
these in collections as the representative or type specimen of
that species, provide it with a Latin binomial (two word, i.e., genus and
specific epithet) species name, and describe its physical appearance in
Latin. Thus, developed the typological species
concept in which all members of a species were of one basic
type. This type did not vary significantly from place to place or
through time.
- Another prevailing idea of the time - Great Chain of Being - species were
fixed into place by God (each species being created separately).
Taxonomists during the 18th through the first part of the 19th century
worked to pigeon-hole all species, because it was thought that this would
give them insight into the Mind of the Creator.
-
CLASSIFICATION OF LIFE'S BIODIVERSITY
Over 1.5 million species of organisms have been described by
biologists. Classification of life's diversity contributes to our
understanding of biology. Initially, naturalist's, especially during the
18th and first part of the 19th century, were interested in classifying life's
diversity in an effort to gain a broad view of the "Divine Master
Plan" (i.e., The Great Chain of Being). Carl von Linne (AKA,
Carolus Linnaeus - 1707-1778) developed criteria and methods for describing and
assigning species names to newly discovered group of organisms. His system
of naming was called Binomial Nomenclature, two word naming system, in
which each species was assigned a two word name, the genus and specific
epithet. (NOTE: IN REVIEW READING MATERIAL IN THE TEXTBOOK, THE BOOK IS IN
ERROR BY SAYING THAT THIS TWO WORD NAME IS COMPRISED OF A GENUS AND SPECIES
NAME; THE SPECIES NAME IS ACTUALLY MADE UP OF THE GENUS AND THE SPECIFIC
EPITHET - refer to Figure 19-4 on page 401 in the
textbook.
Examples of species include:
- Escherichia coli or Escherichia coli or a
bacterium found in the gut of mammals
- Quercus alba or Quercus alba L. or white oak,
originally named by Linnaeus, hence the L.; the term alba means
"white".
- Homo sapiens or Homo sapiens or human being; Homo =
man, sapiens = wise. Wise man.
- Smittium boomerangum or Smittium boomerangum Williams
& Lichtwardt 1990, an insect gut fungus with boomerang-shaped spores and
first observed and described in Australia.
- Morchella esculenta or Morchella esculenta or the
yellow morel mushroom; the term esculenta means "edible".
- Zea mays or Zea mays or maize or corn.
Note that in the previous example that the first letter of the genus name is
upper case; all other letters are lower case. The species name is
italicized or underlined. The author(s) name or initials may or may not
appear after the species name. The author(s) are the folks who originally
published a written description (in their native language and in latin).
The specific epithet is often descriptive of some aspect of the species.
Linnaeus and taxonomist describe a species based on one or a few species,
which are then store in a museum or herbarium collection. The specimen
used as the basis for a species description is called the type specimen.
A type specimen becomes the archetype for the entire species.
Species are classified into ever broader encompassing categories. The
broadest category is the domain. There are three domains: Archaea,
Bacteria, and Eukarya - refer to Figure 1-5 on page 10
in the textbook. Members of the domains Archaea and Bacteria
are prokaryotes while members of the domain Eukarya
are eukaryotes. The next largest
category is the Kingdom level. Only one kingdom is found in domain Archaea,
that is, Archaebacteria. One kingdom represents the domain Bacteria, that
is, Eubacteria (the "true" bacteria - bacteria and cyanobacteria).
In prior classification schemes members of the domains Archaea and Bacteria use
to be classified together into a single kingdom called Monera. The Domain
Eukarya contains all types of eukaryotic organisms from single-celled to
multicellular forms. Four kingdoms are found in the domain Eukarya
(Kingdoms Protista, Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia).
Of the various taxonomic categories, it is generally recognized that all levels
of organizations are artificial, and the only level that is
biologically-significant is the species level.
Classification of Life's Diversity is organized in a
Hierarchical Fashion.
- Kingdom
- Phylum (botanists use the term Division instead of Phylum)
- Class
- Order
- Family
- Genus
- Specific Epithet
A mnemonic device to help remember the order of the various taxonomic categories
from the broadest to the most specific would be to memorize the following
statement and let the letter of each word stand for the first letter of each
category. Ken's pants
caught on
fire, Great Scott!
This hiearchial system of classification to pigeonhole species is analogous
to assigning a location where you might find an individual on the planet Earth.
- Domain
Earth
- Kingdom
North America
- Phylum or
Division
USA
- Class
Arkansas
- Order
Craighead County
- Family
Jonesboro
- Genus
Fictitious Street
- Specific
Epithet
1313
One final note about modern day
classification schemes is an attempt to organize biological diversity according
to evolutionary relationships that exist between species. This is based on
the premise that all life on this planet originated from one or a few common
ancestors which diverged over long periods of time to produce all the forms of
life we currently see on earth. Taxonomy has given way to Systematics
which attempts to reconstruct genealogical relationships among all life forms.
- During the 18th and 19th century, species were thought to be immutable,
unchanging, and fixed. Species don't mix, and when they do
hybridize, the progeny are usually sterile - HYBRID STERILITY (fertile
donkey and fertile horse = sterile mule; fertile horse and fertile zebra
produce a sterile zebroid - refer to Figure 16-2 on
page 326 in the textbook.).
- Mind set of people prior and early into the 19th century - species do not
evolve, they are static or constant. A dog is always a dog, a cat is
always a cat ...........
EVIDENCE THAT CHALLENGED THE ASSUMPTION THAT
LIFE AS STATIC AND UNCHANGING
Biogeography - study of the world distribution of
plants, animals, and other organisms.
Europeans started to explore the world in the 16th century and brought many
exotic and unusual plants and animals back with them.
- Biodiversity is high! According to E. O. Wilson, there are currently over
1,413,000 species of plants, animals, bacteria, protozoa, fungi, etc. that
have been described - refer to Figure 17-2 on page
350 in the textbook.
- 751,000 species of insects
- 281,000 species of all other animals
- 248,400 species of higher plants (ferns, flowering plants, gymnosperms)
- 69,000 species of fungi
- 26,900 species of algae
- 30,800 species of protozoa
- 4,800 bacteria and related forms
- 1,000 types of viruses (alive?)
- Distribution of species varied from place to place. Many places
contained unique or endemic species! Example: The mammals in
Australia:
- Placental mammals - fetus attached to uterus by placenta.
- Marsupial mammals - short gestation period, young raised in pouches - refer
to Figures 15-2A and 17-16 on pages 302 and 360 in the textbook.
- Why are some species only found in certain parts of the world?
- Why are different kinds of organism similar in some respects, but
obviously different?
- Examples: Tasmanian wolf (tiger) vs. gray wolf; sharks (a
cartilaginous fish) and dolphins (a mammal), American cactus vs. African
Euphorbs (spurge).
Comparative Anatomy
- Homologous structures - same structures are modified
for different functions.
- Example: Bones in vertebrate forelimbs (humerus, radius, ulna,
carpals, metacarpal, phalanges) are found in limbs of seals (flippers),
wing (bat and bird), human arm, animal leg (carnivore paw) - refer
to Figure 15-9 on page 315 in the textbook.
- Why are there the same number of vertebrate in the neck of a human and a
giraffe? Is it just a coincidence?
- Vestigial structures - structures that are present
but serve no discernible purpose.
- Examples: pelvic bones in boa constrictors, wings and feathers in
flightless birds (e.g., ostriches, emus); blind eyes in cave-dwelling fish
species - refer to Figure 15-13 on page 318 in
the textbook.
- Embryology- presence of a structures that suggest a
relatedness to other life forms.
- Example: human embryos have pharyngeal arches, a two-chambered
heart, and a tail which disappears before birth! Pharyngeal arches
in fish develop into the gills and the jaw. In humans, pharyngeal
arches do not develop into gills, but into the lower jaw, hyoid bone, and
larynx - refer to Figures 15-14 and 15-15 on
pages 318-319 in the textbook..
- Karl Ernst Von Baer in 1828 noted that the earlier stages of embryos of
more advanced species resembled the earlier stages of development in more
primative species.
- Ernst Heinrich Haeckel in 1867 formulated the "biogenetic
law", that is, ontogeny recapitualtes phylogeny, or in other
words, embryological development retraces ancestory.
- Although in a strict sense, an embryo does not retrace it's ancestory as
it develops, the physical evidence does suggest that developmental
pathways appear to be constrained along certain avenues of
development. This probably goes hand-in-hand with the conservative
nature of the genes which govern this process and the need to insure that
embryological development concludes itself in the production of a viable
offspring.
Fossil Record
- Nicolaus Steno - Anatomist and geologist published a work in 1669
dealing with the the question of "Why is a solid in a
solid?" He was puzzled by the existence of 'tongue stones'
which were found embedded in rock, but which bore a strong resemblance to
sharks teeth. He proposed that some forms of rock (sedimentary rock)
were not always hard but were formed by from a slurry of mud, rock, sand,
and other materials which had encased teeth from sharks before some
geological process had transformed the entire lot into stone. He was one
of the first people to recognized that fossils were the castings and/or
physical remains of life forms that had existed in the past.
- Fossils are often found layered in sedimentary rock. Complex
fossils are found in newer strata, while simpler forms are found in older
layers. Conditions are not always conducive to fossil
formation. Usually only harder components of an organism are
fossilized. Erosion destroys many fossils and sedimentary layers
through the action of wind and rain. Consequently, the fossil record
is not complete but derived from data collected from different parts of
the world. Dating sedimentary layers suggests that these are ancient
- refer to Figures 15-6 and 15-7 on page 308-311
in the textbook..
- The fossil record gives evidence of organisms that no longer exist but
which appear to be part of sequence of species that lead up to modern day
forms (e.g., horseshoe crab - refer to Figure
15-4 on page 305, the horse - refer to
Figure 16-15 on 317 in the textbook.).
- Darwin found fossils in the Andes mountains suggesting that the land had
once be the bed of an ocean. Geologic forces raised the sea floor up
to produce land and mountains.
- Species have gone extinct. Some people suggested that fossilized
creatures had not gone extinct, but that they would be discovered once the
Americas was complete. Generally, this is not so, (dinosaurs and
trilobites are dead - refer to Figure 15-2B page
302 in the textbook.). although many extant organisms are found
in the fossil record. On the other hand, ginkgo trees and
coelacanths (refer to Figure 16-15 on page 342 in
the textbook) are referred to as living fossils, precisely
because these were described from fossilized remains before being
rediscovered as extant species.
- Dinosaurs with teeth, claws, and feathers? Is this extinct animal,
known as Archaeopteryx, a transitional form between dinosaurs and
modern day birds? Check out the following two figures:
Artificial Selection
- Domesticated Plants and Animals have been selected and bred by humans
for various characteristics. Breeds includes, dogs (refer
to Figures 15-8 and 15-17 on pages 314 and 321 in the textbook),
cats, horses, pigeons, fruits, vegetable, etc..
- Forage kale or wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea) is the ancestor
of kohlrabi (expanded just above the roots), cauliflower (abortive
flowers, that are kept white by tying the leaves at the base around the
inflorescence so chlorophyll won't form), broccoli (fertile flower buds),
cabbage (terminal bud), brussels sprouts (axillary buds), and kale
(leaves). All these varieties belong to the same biological scal differences. You can cross broccoli with
cabbage and get fertile offspring (refer to
Figure 1-8 on page 12).
TAKE HOME MESSAGE: species appear to be
malleable, and given a long enough period of time and the proper conditions,
might give rise to a new species! If so, evolution occurs.
The following links are Web Pages you may want
to visit - FYI!
PowerPoint Presentation on Evidence for Biological Change - .PPT
Web Presentation on Evidence for Biological Change - .HTM
The
Evolution/Creation Controversy
NSTA
Position Statement: The Teaching of Evolution
Evolution (History)
- Comte Georges-Louis de Buffon (French, 1707-1788) was the first modern biologist to discard
the concept of special creation. He believed that animals were
plastic, that small variations produced by the environment were accumulated
to make larger differences. Each animal in ascending series of types
was transformed from some simpler ancestor.
-
Erasmus Darwin (English 1731-1802), grandfather of Charles Darwin, added
the further idea that functional responses to external stimuli were
inherited.
Organic life beneath the shoreless
waves
Was born and nurs'd in ocean's pearly caves;
First forms minute, unseen by spheric glass,
Move on the mud, or pierce the watery mass;
These, as successive generations bloom,
New powers acquire and larger limbs assume;
Whence countless groups of vegetation spring,
And breathing realms of fin and
feet and wing.
- The Temple of Nature 1802 by
Erasmus Darwin
- Prevailing idea of the time - Great Chain of Being - species were fixed
into place by God (each species created separately. Taxonomists
worked to pigeon-hole all species, because this would give them insight into
the Divine Master plan.
- Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (French, 1744-1829)
- anatomist/student of classification
- life created a long time ago in a simple state and changed through
time.
- species had a tendency toward perfection, which allowed for small
alterations in morphology, physiology, and behavior to accommodate
changes in the environment.
- Species don't go extinct, they are transmutated into new species.
- belief in a natural tendency for perfection and Theory of Evolution by
Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics (outlined in 1801 and set forth
in his Philosophie Zoologique).
- evolution brought about through internal desires towards perfection.
- frequent continuous use develops/enlarges an organ, while permanent
disuse weakens it until it finally disappears; all acquisitions or
losses wrought through influence of the environment and hence through
use or disuse. Giraffe's - short necked animal to long-necked
animal; weight lifter analogy.
- Lamarck's major contribution to understanding the mechanism of
evolutionary process was:
- Species change over time, and the environment is a factor in that
change.
- His error wasn't as much the genetics (Darwin made the same mistake)
but that he assumed evolution had a goal!!!
-
Trofim Lysenko (1898-1976) - Soviet biologist maintained the
possibility of inheriting environmentally acquired traits.
Influential in directing breeding programs for plants in Soviet Union
through the first two thirds of the 20th century.
Pseudo-Lamarckism - Lysenkoism (visit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trofim_Lysenko for more information).
- Is transmission of human culture from one generation to the next,
Lamarckian?
- Charles Darwin (1859) - "On the origin of species by means of natural
selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for
life" and Alfred Wallace (1858).
- The Theory of evolution through Natural Selection and Modification
with descent.
- Charles Darwin (1809-1882) - English naturalist
- From 1831-1835 - naturalist on the H. M. S. Beagle, explored South
America, the Galápagos Islands; refer to
Figure 17-1 on page 349 in the textbook
- The facts of animal distributionA
and the relations between living/fossil animalsB
learned in his travels led him to consider the origins of species.
The "species problem".
- ASimilar
kinds of organisms confined to different geographic regions often
showed pronounced differences in some of their traits.
- BNow extinct glyptodonts
resembled extant or living armadillos. If these animals were
created at the same time, why were glyptodonts extinct, while
armadillos still alive. Could armadillos have arisen from
glyptodonts?
- Galápagos Islands were 950 kilometers off the coast of Ecuador.
Every island or island cluster was home to divers species, including
birds called finches.
- Darwin reasoned that all 14 species originated from one common
ancestor. The Galápagos Islands (cluster of 25 separate islands)
arose about 5 million years ago. Species that live there must have
colonized these islands from the mainland.
- Land vertebrates, at least seven species of reptiles (one or more
snakes, a huge tortoise, and at least 5 lizards, including two very
large iguanas), seven species of mammals (5 rats and two bats), and a
limited number of birds (including two species of owls, one hawk, one
dove, one cuckoo, one warbler, two flycachters, one marten,
mockingbirds, and the famous Darwin's finches.
- 14 species of Darwin's finches - constitute a separate subfamily
found nowhere else in the world. 13 species are thought to
have evolved on the Galápagos Islands, and one on Cocos Island (NE
of the Galápagos Islands; refer to
Figures 17-10, 17-11 17-12 and 17-13 on pages 356-358 in the textbook
- Click on the following picture to find the
original source at
http://lhs.lps.org/staff/sputnam/Biology/U6Evolution/finches.png.
-

- In 1838, Darwin read the essay by Thomas Malthus (refer
to text on pages 306-307 in the textbook), "Essay on
Population". Populations increase at geometric ratioa
until checked by limiting factors (e.g., food, shelter, fuel). He
came to the recognition of the struggle for existence within all
population and concluded favorable variations would be preserved while
unfavorable variations would not. In 1844, Darwin wrote a summary
of theory but continued to gather data.
- aReproductive potential of
most species higher than actually possible. For example:
- Paramecium (0.25 mm long) can divided about 600 times per
year. If all survived and continued to divide, their bulk
would exceed that of the earth after several months.
- Darwin assumed that elephants breed at 30 years to 100 years,
each female producing but 6 young, in 750 years about 19,000,000
would be alive.
- Puffballs - Giant puffball (7 trillion spores), spores become
fruit bodies they would griddle the earth more than 5 times; or
fruit bodies would stretch twice to the sun and back, and form a
mass eight hundred times the weight of the globe.
- Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913) studying the rich fauna and flora of
the Malay Archipelago, independently and rapidly arrived at similar
conclusions. In 1858, he shared his insights to Darwin (refer
to Figure 15-5 on page 307 in the textbook).
Wallace's essay and a brief of Darwin's conclusions were published
together in the same year.
- Darwin's and Wallace's theory of descent with modification through
variation and natural selection: Basic Assumptions or tenets of
how Darwin and Wallace conceived evolution to occur were as
follows: (Items
highlighted in red and italics in the following text came to light
during the second half of the 19th century and during the first part of
the 20th century).
- Many more individuals are born in each generation than will survive
and reproduce.
- There is variation among individuals; they are not identical in all
their characteristics; refer to Figures 2-6 on page 27 and Figure 2-8 on
page 29 in the textbook.
- SOURCE OF VARIATION IS MUTATION: A RANDOM
PROCESS.
- Mutation - any novel genetic change in
the gene complement or genotype relative to the parental genotypes,
beyond that achieved by genetic recombination during meiosis.
- Individuals with certain characteristics have a better chance of
surviving and reproducing than individuals with other characteristics.
- NATURAL SELECTION: A NONRANDOM PROCESS IMPOSED BY THE ENVIRONMENT.
- Some of the characteristics resulting in differential survival and
reproduction rates are heritable.
- Darwin assumed this, without knowing whether
it was true or not.
- Darwin was a proponent of pangenesis,
which was a good guess but incorrect.
- Vast spans of time have been available for change.
- Darwin was influenced by Lyell's Principles of Geology and
Uniformitarionism - enormous time spans involved in geological
changes - natural forces persisted over time - current processes of
geological activity were sufficient to explain past geological
phenomena.
- Lyell and Darwin were opposed to the concept of catastrophism
==> i.e., different strata of fossil represented devastating
extinctions followed by "new creation" and progressionism
with each new creation event leading to newer advanced forms - refer
to Figure 15-3 page 304 in the textbook.
For
an overall summary of the Theory of Evolution proposed by Darwin and
Wallace - click here for an MS Word - DOC.
Much of the following can be viewed as a PowerPoint or Web Page (HTML)
Presentation - Go to:THE HISTORY OF LIFE
(PPT) or THE HISTORY OF LIFE (HTML).
ORIGIN OF LIFE - A TIMELINE
Conditions on earth, before life began - Refer
to Figures 18-6 and 18-7 on pages 380 and 382 in the textbook
Entire universe is thought to have arisen about 15 billion years ago;
the solar system started taking shape about 5 billion years ago; the earth
starts to coalesce and cool about 4.5 billion years ago; first protobiont
appears about 3.5 billion years ago. As the earth
coalesced, outgassed, and cooled, the early atmosphere, oceans, and crust
formed. Hydrogen and helium being lighter gases escaped the
gravitational pull of the planet as energy from the sun swept these gases out
into space. Denser molecules and matter remained behind, held by the
gravitational pull of the earth itself. The early earth was rich in water,
silica, metals, heavier molecules, and other rocky components. Early
oceans became salty as carbonates, Mg+2, K+, and other
ions accumulated as acids (e.g., H2CO3, HNO3, H2SO4)
interacted with water and inorganic matter. Atmosphere arose as the
earth formed and as outgassing occurred from within the earth, CO (carbon
monoxide), CO2, H2S (hydrogen sulfide), CH4
(methane), and NH3 (ammonia). The
characteristics of the early atmosphere is based, in part, on what planetary
astronomers have discovered from other planets in the solar system.
Primeval Life
In the 1930s, Alexander I. Oparin from Russia and J. B. S. Haldane from
England, proposed that life arose under certain conditions that allowed for
abiotic formation of organic compounds. Oparin and Haldane assumed that
three conditions had to exist:
- Anoxic atmosphere (presence of free oxygen would tend to interfere
with chemical reactions that transform simple organic molecules into complex
ones)
- Precursor molecule supply had to be in abundance
- A source of Energy to start and keep the process going
In 1953, Stanley Miller (in Urey's Lab) tried to replicate such conditions in
the laboratory to see what would happen. In a sterile vessel containing no
O2, Miller mixed a molecule supply (i.e., H2, CH4,
H2O, and NH3), a source of energy (i.e., an electric spark
- other folks have used UV light), and modulated the temperature from 0-100 C
over the course of one week. At the end of the week, Miller collected
samples of the "primordial soup" and analyzed it. Constituents
of the soup did not contain life, but it did contain complex organic
macromolecules, including amino acids, nucleosides, polyphosphates (e.g., ATP) -
refer to Figures 18-8 and 18-9 on pages 384 in the
textbook.
The Protobiont or Protocell- the first living cell. How it formed,
no one really knows. Some properties associated with living cells can
arise from the interactions between organic macromolecules, water, and the
environment. Most probably, the transition
from a non-living complex system of macromolecules to a living organism somehow
occurred by a yet undetermined means in accordance to the natural laws of
chemistry and physics. Due to the
relative complexity of a living cell, even a single-celled prokaryote, some
scientists have ventured the hypothesis that life could not arise through
abiotic (non-living) processes in the time scale (about 1 billion years) that it is thought
to have occurred. The late Francis Crick, in his 1981 book, Life Itself,
proposed that life was brought to earth by intelligent extraterrestrials.
The recent suggestion that meteorites from Mars might contain fossilized remains
of ancient organisms has continued to fuel the debate(refer to Figure 18-10 on pages
385 in the
textbook). The panspermia
hypothesis suggests that life came to earth from some external source.
After life began:
Early life forms were probably unicellular and resemble modern day
prokaryotes. After life got started, it probably existed in an anaerobic
environment. As more complex biochemical pathways evolved, such as
photosynthesis, waste products produced of such processes (i.e., oxygen) were
toxic to existing organisms.
- Geological Evidence
- uranite - UO2 precipitates in stream beds. Early
atmosphere was probably < 1% O2. Geologic record
indicates uranite started to accumulate about 2 billion years ago.
- iron oxide or rust suddenly starts to accumulate in rock that are 2-3
billion years old
- Biochemical Evidence
- Early attempts of cellular respiration, early stages of this process
do not require oxygen (glycolysis, fermentation), but later stages
require oxygen (oxidative respiration).
The origin of eukaryotes and the origin of membrane-bound organelles
Lynn Margulis (1967) has been a strong advocate for the Endosymbiont
hypothesis This hypothesis proposes that mitochondria and chloroplasts
became incorporated into cytoplasm of eukaryotes through the symbiosis of larger
cells with with bacteria (mitochondria and flagella) and cyanobacteria
(chloroplasts) - refer to Figure 18-16 on page 392 in
the textbook.
- prokaryotes, mitochondria, and chloroplasts possess similar genomes; each
type contain a naked circular loop of DNA
- ribosomes produced by prokaryotes, mitochondria, and chloroplasts are
similar in size and structure and smaller than those found in the cytoplasm
of eukaryotic cells
- inner membranes of mitochondria and chloroplasts are similar to the plasma
membranes of bacteria.
- mitochondria, chloroplasts, and prokaryotes reproduce asexually through
binary fission.
- antibiotics that inhibit protein synthesis in bacteria also do the same to
mitochondria and chloroplasts but not to inhibit protein synthesis mediated
by the nucleus
Early Eukaryotes
About 2.5 billion years ago, a billion years after the origin of the
protobiont, eukaryotes evolved and proliferate. We would recognize many of
these forms as being similar to modern day amoebae, protozoa, and unicellular
green algae. Multicellular forms do not appear in the fossil record until
about 0.6 bya during a period of vast change on the face of life.
Cambrian explosion - "Life's Big Bang" occurred about 600 million
years ago
- evidence of this preserved as fossils in the Burgess Shale
- Animal Phyla in the Burgess Shale include: Porifera, Brachiopoda,
Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, and Chordata (each phylum
represents a different body plan).
Over the past 600 million years there has been
an explosion of animal, plant, and fungal diversity.
Major evolutionary trends:
- a transition from being unicellular, filamentous, or forming small
colonies of cells toward becoming multicellular
- greater complexity
- development of organs and organ systems
- changes in reproductive strategies
- development of adaptations to exist in and exploit a terrestrial
environment
- greater interdependence/more interactions among different species
LIFE ON EARTH IS ANCIENT
(Based on studies of geology and the fossil record)
IF THE HISTORY OF LIFE WERE PLACED ON A 24 HOUR SCALE (Keep in mind
that these times are approximate)
- Midnight - first protobiont or life forms come into existence (approx. 3.5
billion years ago) or midnight. Prokaryotes rule! Evolution of
photosynthesis eventually leads to accumulation of toxic levels of
oxygen - leads to mass extinction.
- 10:17 a.m. - first eukaryotes (e.g., unicellular organisms -
protozoan-like).
- 8:18 p.m. - trilobites and other aquatic multicellular organisms appear in
earth's oceans (Cambrian explosion).
- 8:34 p.m. - first vertebrates (e.g., marine and fresh-water fish).
- 9:15 p.m. - land plants first appear.
- 9:36 p.m. - winged insects take to the land and air.
- 10:34 p.m.- mass extinction.
- 11:18 p.m. - dinosaurs rule.
- 11:19 p.m. mass extinction (approximately 75 % of all life goes extinct).
- 11:33 p.m. (approximately 65 mya) - adaptive radiation of birds and
mammals.
- 11:59 p.m. - Humans arrive on the scene (200,000 years ago).
- 11:59:56 p.m.- Birth of human civilization.
HUMAN EVOLUTION
Mammals- share characteristics with other mammals such as: vertebrate
with a spinal chord, skeleton, skull housing a large brain, ability to give
birth to live offspring, mammary glands, hair or fur, and common ancestry.
Humans differ from other mammals:
- Teeth
- canines - for tearing and piercing (most carnivores)
- incisors - nip and cut food (rodents)
- premolars with cusps - grinding and crushing (horses)
- molars with cusps - grinding and crushing (cattle)
- Early and more primitive mammals have 66 teeth; modern mammals have
44; humans have 32.
- The incidence of Wisdom teeth appear to be diminishing (natural
selection?) in human populations (in Central Europe, one or more wisdom
teeth are missing in 19% of population. Wisdom teeth or third
molars are common among Native Americans, but not among Africans).
- Offspring have an extended period of learning.
- Humans have an overall larger brain size.
- Humans possess behavioral flexibility
TRENDS IN PRIMATE EVOLUTION
- Change in overall skeletal structure and mode of locomotion - bipedalism
(able to move on 2 appendages for extended periods of time; with minimum
energy loss) -refer to Figure 17-21 and 1725 on page
368 and 371 in
the textbook .
- Modification of hands - humans can cup hands and possess a opposable thumb
- refer to Figure 17-23 on page 370 in the textbook
- Less reliance on sense of smell and more reliance on sense of daytime and
color vision, and depth perception.
- Change in dentition - primates moved from eating insects to more fruits
and vegetables to becoming omnivorous - adaptation of teeth is probably
caused by natural selection, so that the kinds of teeth best able to
accommodate a particular diet become enhanced over time - refer
to Figure 17-23 on page 369 in the textbook.
- Brain expansion - more elaborate.
- Gorilla 600 cm3
- Humans 1350 cm3
- Higher intelligence may have resulted from tool making, need for better
memory, or to increase ability to anticipate jumps (from branch to branch)
or throws (weapons and spears). Once you let go of something, you
don't have any way to control its motion.
- Behavioral and cultural evolution- ability to learn and mimic
behavior. ex. language.
CULTURAL EVOLUTION
The movement to different types of environments may have influenced cultural
evolution. The culture tends to be Lamarckian because changes can be
acquired and passed on. Examples are language, tool making, technology,
and domestication of plants and animals. The transition from humans making
a living as hunter/gathers to an agriculturally-based civilization started about
12-14,000 years ago, based on archeological evidence.
ANCESTORS OF MODERN HOMO SAPIENS
Mitochondrial "Eve": determined through lineage coalescence; all
human descending from a very small population (probably African) @ 200,000 years
ago. These dates are inferred based on the fact that mitochondrial DNA is
maternally inherited and on assumption that mutations in this DNA happen at
consistent rate. Thus far the fossil evidence tends to support these
findings.
The family tree for primates:
- Prosimians - lemuroids; lemurs, lorises, etc.
- Tarsioids - tarsioids; tarsiers
- Anthropoids - ceboids; new world monkeys
- Cercopithecoids - old world monkeys; prehensile tails
- Hylobatids - gibbons, siamang
- Pongids - orangutan, gorilla, chimps
- Hominids - humans and their most recent ancestors
Morphologically humans and apes are distinct from one another. Based on
molecular data, isozyme polymorphisms and sequences of mitochondrial and genomic
DNA, humans and apes, in particular, chimpanzees are quite similar. Humans
and chimpanzees share 52 % of the same alleles. Nucleic acid differences
are even less, 1.1 percent difference. If humans were more objective, when
it came to taxonomic classification, humans and chimpanzees and perhaps even
other apes, might be classified in the same genus. Should humans be
classified as Pan sapiens instead of Homo sapiens, or chimpanzees
as Homo troglodytes instead of Pan troglodytes? Was the
common ancestor to humans and chimpanzees separated by the Great Rift Valley in
Africa, leading to allopatric speciation? Humans probably evolved in
response to changing environmental conditions as forests gave way to
savannas. Some evidence supports this hypothesis, but it is far from
conclusive.

PHYLOGENETIC TREES FOR PRIMATES AND HOMINIDS
This page is maintained and constructed by Dr. Martin Huss.
Last updated 1-25-2006.
| |
|