Mary Jackson Pitts, Ph.D.

 

Hit Counter

mpitts@astate.edu

Home ] Up ] methods ]

 RESEARCH METHODS

•      SURVEYS

•      CONTENT ANALYSIS

•      EXPERIMENTS

•      CASE STUDIES

 CHOOSING THE METHOD

•      WHAT DO YOU WANT TO LEARN?

•      WHICH METHOD BEST ANSWERS THE QUESTION?

–  SURVEYS ALLOW YOU TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT PEOPLE’S PERCEPTIONS, DEMOGRAPHIC INFO, OPINIONS AND BELIEFS.

 CHOOSING THE METHOD

•      WHAT DO YOU WANT TO LEARN?

•      WHICH METHOD BEST ANSWERS THE QUESTION?

–  CONTENT ANALYSIS ALLOWS YOU TO EXPLORE THE CURRENT STATUS OF MEDIA BY EXAMINING MEDIA CONTENT.

 CHOOSING THE METHOD

•      WHAT DO YOU WANT TO LEARN?

•      WHICH METHOD BEST ANSWERS THE QUESTION?

–   EXPERIMENTS ALLOW YOU TO EXAMINE CAUSE AND EFFECT.

 CHOOSING THE METHOD

•      WHAT DO YOU WANT TO LEARN?

•      WHICH METHOD BEST ANSWERS THE QUESTION?

–   CASE STUDIES ALLOW  YOU TO CLOSELY EXAMINE THROUGH A VARIETY OF METHODS ONE PARTICULAR GROUP, CAMPAIGN OR PHENOMENA.

 THE METHOD: SURVEY

•       THREE FORMS

–  PERSONAL OR FACE TO FACE INTERVIEWS

–  TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS

–  SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONNAIRES

 THE METHOD: SURVEY

•       THE INTERVIEW

–  INCREASES COMPLIANCE

–  COSTLY

–  TRAINING INTERVIEWERS

–  INTERVIEWER BIAS

–  RELIABILITY OF METHOD

 THE METHOD: SURVEY

•       THE TELEPHONE INTERVIEW

–   COSTLY, BUT NOT AS MUCH AS FACE TO FACE.

–  NO VISUALS CAN BE USED

–  LIMITED TO THOSE WHO HAVE PHONES.  ABOUT 5% OF HOMES DO NOT HAVE A PHONE

 

 THE METHOD: SURVEY

•       SELF-ADMINISTERED (MAILED) SURVEYS

–    Greater Anonymity

–    Low response rates

–    Question ambiguity

–    Cheap

 THE METHOD: SURVEY

•        Types of questions

–  factual questions (threatening and non-threatening

 Creating a questionnaire

•      Know the purpose of your study before you begin.

–  Ie.    What are television viewers’ perceptions of local tv stations’ coverage of sports violence?

 

 Creating a questionnaire

•       Surveys...Scale development--- DeVellis

•      Scale use

   C    Use theory

   C     Considering the construct

   C     Previous scales

 Creating a questionnaire

•      Surveys...Scale development--- DeVellis

•      Scale items

•      Generate an item pool

•      ---   Consider the latent variable

•      ---   Consider the manifest variable

 

 Creating a questionnaire

•       Surveys...Scale development--- DeVellis

•      Scale items

             The more the better

•                    Reading difficulty

 Writing the questions or statements

•         Avoid double barreled items.

•         “I support civil rights because             discrimination is a crime against God.” 

 Writing the questions or statements

•        Ambiguous pronoun references

•           “ Murderers and rapists should not seek pardons from politicians because they are the scum of the earth.”

 Writing the questions or statements

•         Misplaced modifiers

•              “Our representatives should work diligently to legalize prostitution in the House of Representatives

 Writing the questions or statements

•          Positively and negatively worded items.

•              You can use both to keep the respondent conscious of what they are reading.   But, you may also create confusion for the respondent.          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

•      Scale formats.

 

•      Thurstone:

•           You can have items that correspond to different intensities of an attribute, spaced to represent equal intervals and could be formatted with agree -disagree responses. 

•           Calibration of answers is possible

•           Finding items that rise to specific levels of a      phenomena is difficult.

 

•      Guttman scale:

•                 The focus is on a transition from affirmative to negative responses .

•                  Here when you respond positively to one level of a hierarchy, the implication exists that you satisfy the criteria of all lower levels of that hierarchy.

•                   Ie.. Do you smoke?  Do you smoke more than 10 cigarette?  Do you smoke more than a pack a day?

 

•                   Cause and effect can not be assessed in these two cases.

 

 

 

 

 

•      Likert statements: Often used to measure opinions, beliefs and attitudes.

•           You must state the opinion, attitude, belief, or other      construct under study in clear terms.

•            Declarative sentences---followed by response options      that indicate varying degrees of agreement with or      endorsement of the statement.---responses should      have roughly equal intervals with respect to      agreement.

•           Six responses is not uncommon. 

•           Strongly disagree, moderately disagree, mildly      disagree, mildly agree, moderately agree, and      strongly agree.

 

 

•      Semantic differential: Used with one or more stimuli.

•           Here we identify the target stimulus and follow it      with a list of adjective pairs.

•           Each pair represents opposite ends of a continuum.

•      Stimuli:

•              Reporters

 

•       Honest ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ Dishonest   (Unipolar set)

•       Quiet   ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ Noisy   (Bipolar)

 

 

•      You may use bipolar adjectives that express opposite attributes, such as friendly and hostile

•      Unipolar adjective look at a single attribute.

 

•      Visual Analog

 

•          No Pain at All ___________________The worst pain I ever experienced.

 

•          Single item....Hard to test reliability

 

 

•      Binary options...limited variability    ...Two answer... Variability limited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Writing the questions or statements

•           Focus is on a single affirmative response

•      Scale formats.

 

 Writing the questions or statements

•        Scale formats.

•        Thurstone:

•        Guttman scale:

•        Cause and effect can not be    assessed     in these two cases.

 Writing the questions or statements

•       Likert statements: 

•      Semantic differential:   

•       Visual Analog

•       Binary options...limited variability    ...Two answer... Variability limited

 

 

 Questionnaire Design

•       Get an expert to check the scale.

•       Mild statements are not very useful.

•       Survey questions

•       Use simple language..

•       Long vs short questions....  Clarity is                                   the key

 Questionnaire Design

•        Double barreled questions

•        Double negatives..  Avoid

•        Length of lists....

•        Recalling things from the past.....cuing

•        Hypothetical questions

•        Specificity of questions.

•        Open vs closed ended.

 

 Questionnaire Design

•         Filtering questions..

•         Question ordering

•         Multiple questions for a topic

•         Page layout..white space

 Questionnaire Design

•       Pre-testing

•      Checking for variation...meaning..task difficulty..respondents interest and attention....     

 Questionnaire Design

•        Flow and naturalness of the sections

•                   Order of questions

•                   Skip patterns..

•                Timing

•                Respondent’s interest and                                attention

•                Respondents well being.

 Content Analysis

•         Content analysis is any technique for making inferences by systematically and objectively identifying specified characteristics of messages.

 Content Analysis

•       Various types of content design

–  Characteristics of communication

–  To make inferences as to the antecedents of communication (encoding)

–  To make inferences as to the effects   of communication (decoding)

 Content Analysis

•        To do a content analysis

–  What unit of content is to be classified?

–    What are your recording units?

–    What is your context unit?

–    Quantification of identified units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

•      Procedures for content analysis

 

•      1. Select a topic

 

•      2. Decide sample

 

•      3. Define concepts or unites to be counted

 

•      4. Construct categories

 

•      5. Create coding form

 

•      6. Train coders

 

•      7. Collect data

 

•      8. Measure intercoder reliability

 

•      9. Analyze data

 

•      10. Report results

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

•          

 

 Content Analysis

•       Procedures for content analysis

–  1. Select a topic

–  2. Decide sample

–  3. Define concepts or unites to be counted

–  4. Construct categories

–  5. Create coding form

–  6. Train coders

–  7. Collect data

 Content Analysis

•       Procedures for content analysis

–  8. Measure intercoder reliability

–  9. Analyze data

–  10. Report results

 

 

 Experiments

•        Experimental research is concerned with control of independent variables to determine their impact on dependent variables.           

 

 Experiments

•      Advantages:   Cause and effect can be established.

•      Control is a key element:

–       Control of conditions----environmental              control

–       Control of variables---reduction of        competing explanation

 Experiments

•       Control is a key element:

–    The attempt is made to control competing explanations, the experimenter tries to isolate the effect of one or more variables.  

 Experiments

•       Control is a key element:

–     Statistical control:

–     Disadvantages

•             Research takes place in artificial            settings.

•           Subjects are passive reactors.

•           External validity issues

 

 Experiments  (designs)

•       Experimental:

•           Random assignment

•           Allows for causal relationships.

•      Non-experimental

•           Establishes that a relationship exists.

•           Non random assignment.

 Case Study

•      A research method that focuses on individual cases rather than cross sectional samples.

•      This is a sample of one or two

•      David Manning White (gatekeeping, 1952)  

 Case Study

•       Uses

•      Advertising and Public Relations

 

 Case Study

•        Steps

–  Case history

•   define the problem

–   Sources---standard and poors…industry reports  

–  Identify critical factors

–  Alternative solutions

–  Analyze alternatives

 

 

 

 Case Study

•        Steps

–   Recommendations

–   Justification