Limnology Lab Report Rubric
Lab Report #____Authors'
name:________________________________
|
Content |
Unsatisfactory
0 |
Borderline
1.5 |
Satisfactory
3 |
Exemplary
4.5 |
Score |
|
Title Page
Title, course, instructor, semester |
Missing more than
two of the following (course, instructor, semester), or the title, or
the name; Title is lacking all together |
Missing two of the
following (course, instructor, semester), except title or name; Title is
insufficient by not being informative of the report content |
Missing one of the
following (course, instructor, semester) except title or name; Title is
too long and provides too much information that is not concise or
indicative of the topic |
Contains title,
name, date, course, instructor, semester; Title is a clear and concise
statement that indicated the topic that your are writing on |
|
|
Introduction:
Explanation of topic |
No introduction is provided |
Gives very little information; Consists
of only 1 or 2 sentences |
Gives too much information, more like a
summary. Length more > 5 sentences |
Presents a concise lead-in to the report
by explaining what the topic of the report is; defines any broad topic /
title topic terms that provides the reader with a background of the
report; Length should be limited to 3-5 sentences |
|
|
Purpose / Problem / Goal / Objective
Statement |
No statement is provided |
Addresses an issue which is unrelated to
research. Statement located as a separate section just after
introduction |
Addresses an issue somewhat related to
research. Located as a separate section just after introduction |
Addresses a real issue directly related
to research findings. Located as a separate section just after
introduction |
|
|
Methods:
Describe how the study was conducted;
written in the past tense |
Not sequential, most steps are missing or
are confusing. |
Some of the steps are understandable;
most are confusing and lack detail. Written as a list of instructions |
Most of the steps are understandable;
some lack detail or are confusing. Lacked modifications or did not refer
to original procedure. |
Presents easy-to-follow methods for
different part of the laboratory which are logical and adequately
detailed; entire procedure not normally written out, but refer to
handout or source, unless some modification to the procedure was made,
in which the changes should be described |
|
|
Results:
Presentation of your data, written in
past tense |
No results are reported |
Both incomplete, minor inaccuracies
and/or illegible characters. Results not reported in the same order as
the methods were written; details of report finding written first, major
findings second; Reference to a table or a figure, was simple
reinstatement of data in the figure or table; |
Both accurate, some ill-formed
characters; Results may or may not be reported in the same order as the
methods were written; mixing of major findings and details for each
categories; Reference to a table or a figure, was simple reinstatement
of data in the figure or table; |
Condense and clear report of the data and
answering of questions. Results are reported in the same order as the
methods were written; major findings written first for each category,
followed more detailed information; When referring to a table or a
figure, write about the pattern of the data via ranges and average
values; |
|
|
Discussion:
Your interpretation of the results
Significance of the results and sources
of error |
Presents an illogical explanation for
findings and does not address any of the questions suggested in the
handout. |
Presents an illogical explanation for
findings and addresses few questions. |
Presents a logical explanation for
findings and addresses some of the questions. Consists of a paragraph of
a few sentences |
Presents a logical explanation for
findings and addresses most of the questions; explanation of any sources
of error. Consists of several paragraphs of several to a few sentences
per paragraph |
|
|
References:
See following pages for examples |
No references listed |
Some references listed; or not properly
formatted |
All references listed, but not properly
formatted; or not all references listed, but were properly formatted |
All references listed and properly
formatted |
|
|
Figures:
Have a horizontal (bottom) and vertical
(left) axis;
Figure legend listed below
the figure; symbols and units present in axes labels; see following
pages for examples |
No figure legend(s); No horizontal lines
breaking the header from the data and or multiple vertical lines present |
Figure legend(s) only consists of the
word “Figure” plus what ever number it is. (e.g. Figure 1) without a
description. Figure legend(s) may be on the top or the bottom of figure |
Figure legend(s) is/are presented at the
bottom of the figure. Figure legend(s) include(s) the number (e.g. Fig.
1), but does not accurately describe the figure; or does not include the
fig. number; or is placed above the figure itself |
Figure legend(s) accurately describe(s)
the figure(s) and provide enough information to stand alone without
referring back to the text; are located below the figure itself. Figure
legend(s) are listed below the figure. |
|
|
Tables:
Table legend (i.e. title) located above
the table itself and should be self explanatory of the information
contained in the table. Has 5 main points: 1) the number and title; 2)
the vertical heading(s) (column) called boxhead; 3) the horizontal
headings (row headings) called the stub; 4) the fields that have the
data; 5) 3 horizontal lines across the table with 1 placed below table
legend (title), 1 below the boxhead; and 1at the bottom of the table;
See example |
No table legend; No horizontal lines
breaking the header from the data and or multiple vertical lines present |
Table legend only consists of the word
“Table” plus what ever number it is. (E.g. Table 1) without and
description. Table legend may be on the top or the bottom of Table |
Table legend is presented at the top of
the table. Table legend includes the number (e.g. Table 1), but does
not accurately describe the table; or does not include the table number;
or is placed below the table itself |
Table legends (titles) has table number
and accurately describes the table and provide enough information to
stand alone without referring back to the text; are located above the
figure itself: Tables are have only 3 horizontal lines, 1 below the
title, one below the boxhead, and one below the last data row
|
|
|
ACCURACY |
Unsatisfactory
0 |
Borderline
.5 |
Satisfactory
1 |
Exemplary
1.5 |
Score |
|
Units/Data
Manipulation: |
Units are rarely
used or are generally incorrect. Dimensional analysis not used. Math not
shown. Figures display data incorrectly. |
Units used only in
some key parts of report Calculations contain some errors in dimensional
analysis or math. Figures correct. No labels or legend |
Units generally used
correctly in most of report. Calculations contain few errors in
dimensional analysis or math. Figures correct, variables unlabeled. |
Units are used
correctly and consistently throughout the report. Calculations clearly
laid out. Dimensional analysis/Math correct. Figures display data
correctly, all variables labeled. |
|
|
Organization and Writing Style |
Unsatisfactory
0 |
Borderline
1.25 |
Satisfactory
2.5 |
Exemplary
4 |
Score |
|
Organization:
Title page, Introduction, Statement of
Problem, Methods, Results, Discussion, References, Tables, Figures |
More than 2
categories missing or out of sequence. |
Not more than 2
categories missing or out of sequence. |
Not more than one
category missing or out of sequence. |
Proper
order/sequence as listed |
|
|
Grammar & Spelling |
Very frequent grammar and/or spelling
errors. |
More than two errors. |
Only one or two errors. |
All grammar and spelling are correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
(out of 50) |
|
WHAT IS A RUBRIC?
Scientific Report Rubric
Rubric — a set of guidelines for assessment which states the characteristics
and/or dimensions being assessed with clear performance criteria and a rating
scale.
A scoring rubric consists of: a
fixed scale, a list of characteristics describing performance for each of the
points on a scale, and clear performance targets for students
How to Design a Rubric 1) Choose
a product or demonstration based on a specific outcome(s) that you wish to
assess, then describe a superior performance / demonstration. 2) Describe a
limited performance/demonstration. 3) Describe different levels of performance
expectations between the above two levels. 4) Encourage student input into the
performance standards. 5) Provide exemplars to ensure students understand the
standards.
Creating Effective Rubrics
Outcomes participants will: 1) Knowledge: demonstrate an
understanding of the need for a wide variety of assessment and evaluation tools
and effective scoring sheets (rubrics). 2) Skills: become more
skilled in developing clear criteria that will form the basis for appropriate
assessment tools and scoring sheets; reflect on the ideas provided and determine
how they could be implemented in the school. 3) Values: identify
that the main purpose of assessment and evaluation is to provide information for
teachers and students to improve learning; acknowledge students as partners in
the assessment process; recognize that being a reflective and collaborative
practitioner helps one to continue to improve one's assessment and evaluation
practices.
Citations and References:
INTEXT CITATIONS:
When there is more than
one citation for a particular statement, list them (1) chronologically,
beginning with the oldest (with “in press” and “unpublished” sources at the
end), and then (2) alphabetically within years (with citations containing “and”
and “et al.” in alphabetical order):
(Roberts 1985; Johnson 1987; Berger, in press)
(Eldridge 1989; Smith 1992; Smith and Thomas 1992)
Exception:
Group publications by the same author or authors together, even if this violates
the rule about chronological listing:
(Roberts 1992, 1997; Smith 1996)
REFERENCE LISTS:
References should be
listed (1) alphabetically by authors’ last names (ignoring the word “and”) and
then (2) chronologically, with items that are in press coming last.
Smith,
R. C. 1992. Spawning patterns in. . . .
Smith,
R. C., J. B. Oldham, and W. F. Stone. 1998. Determinants of. . . .
Smith,
R. C., and H. Thompson. 1995. Observations on. . . .
Smith,
R. C., and H. Thompson. 1997. Additional observations on. . . .
Journals:
Hochachka, P. W. 1990. Scope for survival: a conceptual “mirror” to Fry’s scope
for activity. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119:622-628.
Kennedy, V. S. 1990. Anticipated effects of climate change on estuarine and
coastal fisheries. Fisheries 15(6):16-24.
Books:
Brönmark, C., and L.-A. Hansson. 1998. The biology of lakes and ponds. Oxford
University Press, New York.
Murphy, B. R., and D. W. Willis, editors. 1996. Fisheries techniques, 2nd
edition. AmericanFisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
G. E.
Hutchinson. 1975. A treatise on limnology, volume 1, part 1. Geography and
physics oflakes. Wiley, New York.
Reports:
USEPA
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1986. Quality criteria for water. USEPA,
Report 440/5-86-001, Washington, D.C.
May,
B., and R. Zubik. 1985. Quantitative. . . . Annual Report to the Bonneville
Power Administration, Project 83-465, Portland, Oregon.
Magazines and Newspapers:
Tucker, J. W., Jr. 1985. Sheepshead. . . . Tropical Fish Hobbyist (January):64-65,
68.
Larsen, R. 1986. Forestry and fisheries. The Seattle Times (February 9):A21, 27.
Saving
the ocean. 2003. The Washington Post (May 21):A30.
Theses and Dissertations:
Chitwood, J. B. 1976. The effects of threadfin shad as a forage species for
largemouth bass incombination with bluegill, redear, and other forage species.
Master’s thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Hartman, K. J. 1993. Striped bass, bluefish, and weakfish in the Chesapeake Bay:
energetics, trophic linkages, and bioenergetics model applications. Doctoral
dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.
Web Sites:
Baldwin, N. A., R. W. Saalfield, M. R. Dochoda, H. J. Buettner, and R. L.
Eschenroder. 2000. Commercial fish production in the Great Lakes, 1867-1996.
Great Lakes Fishery Commission. Available:
www.glfc.org/databases/commercial/commerc.asp.
(September2000).
(Note: The date in parentheses indicates when the site was accessed.)
Software:
SPSS.
1993. SPSS for Windows, release 6.0. SPSS, Chicago.


Download a pdf of this page
|